Ranting against Facebook couple cuteness
By Natalie Serafini, Assistant Editor
Over the past year that I spent as an Opinions Editor, I may have given some of you the impression that Iām a rather open and public person, based on my penchant for disclosing embarrassing facts about myself at almost every opportunity.
Iām really not. While I donāt mind being open and honest about myself in person and in print, Iām selective about my shares. This is partly because I think there should be a point to my publicity, and partly because I donāt like sharing what I feel only I and few others should be privy to.
Thatās why Facebook couple cuteness kills me; those public displays of affection that could easily be sent in a text or otherwise private message. Those proclamations that are destined to be embarrassing relics of your relationship past when That Guy I Dated for Five Months is no longer in the profile picture.
Of course, these public declarations are temporary in the sense of being only a deleted comment or photo away from extinction, but they last in the minds of your friends, acquaintances, and people you havenāt seen in years. Personally, I donāt need to keep former classmates from high school updated on my personal life. The gabby gals of Sex and the City may go into extreme detail about their romances, but they keep it within their square of friends. Their personal relationship sagasāthe highs, lows, and rock bottomsāarenāt generally divulged to their more distant circle of friends (even if Carrie does write columns on the subject).
Part of my aversion to these public displays lays in not understanding the motivations behind them. Call me unsentimental, but a status update, no matter how heartfelt, isnāt exactly romantic. Facebook is not a book of poetry. Youād be hard-pressed to argue that sentiments immortalized on a social media site will carry the same simple beauty as Harold Pinterās āIt Is Here,ā or Wislawa Szymborskaās āThank-You Note.ā
You might protest that the goal of a status like āI love [insert name] so much,ā is simply to communicate with your boyfriend or girlfriend. Itās practical, and Facebook is a means of communication, after all.
Nope. The reason for posting a veritable monsoon of pictures, or sharing personal relationship moments, or typing statuses that beg for an āAww, you two are the cutest!ā is not that thereās no way to communicate with your significant other on a private level. If youāre able to post an effusive status about your love, you can send your love a private message.
Instead, the sharing of personal relationship moments and details seems to be grounded in either attention-seekingāagain, begging for an āAww, you two are the cutest!ā commentāor insecurity. Attention-seeking probably shouldnāt be a motivation in any relationship decision, and it seems to me that, if youāre secure in your relationship, you donāt need to invite the eyes or voices of others. The shaky scaffolding of other peopleās attention is too weak a structure to hold a relationship together, and trust issues arenāt going to be resolved through a simple Facebook update.
Iām not a tyrant, mind you. I know how difficult it is to not be āadorable,ā hard as you try. Moderate sharing is fine, and engagement, wedding, and pregnancy announcements can justify a status update.
Declarations of love and devotion that are excessive, incessant, and overly personal seem to almost trivialize the relationship. Facebook is a breeding ground for narcissism and mild stalking, but sharing aspects of your personal relationshipāand one of the more intimate relationships that you can have in lifeāseems a boundary too far crossed.
When you share too much of your relationship, it stops being yours; it loses its special quality because the little moments that you shared with your partner are shared with all of your Facebook friends. I like the idea of keeping certain private things private. If thereās a point to sharing, Iāll share, but when it comes to my more personal life, Iād rather keep it personal.