Ambiguity in the M-103 proposal

Photo of Iqra Khalid via

Photo of Iqra Khalid via

Compromises essential to freedoms

By Colten Kamlade, Senior Columnist


There has been a surprising lack of conversation about the recent “anti-Islamophia” motion that was proposed by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid. Among other things, M-103 states that the government should “condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination.” The Conservatives, as well as some Liberals, have been hesitant to pass this motion. Their concern is that the word “Islamophobia” is too vague, and therefore open to interpretation.

On one hand, the wording matters. Members of parliament should know exactly what they are voting on. People complain that the Conservatives are bogging down a process that should be simple. I don’t believe that’s true. Islamophobia is an ambiguous word and is often used unfairly to silence legitimate criticism. In response to M-103, the conservatives put forward a similar motion that removed the word “Islamophobia.” The intent was not to exclude Islam, but to eliminate ambiguity and avoid giving the religion preferential treatment. The conservative motion explicitly denounces discrimination against Islamic people. When asked why they turned down the alternative motion, the Liberals responded by saying that the “wording matters.” This is true, which is why M-103 should not contain words with unclear definitions.

On the other hand, M-103 is not a bill, which means it will not become law. If the motion is passed, from a legal standpoint it cannot restrict anyone’s right to freedom of speech. A committee will be formed to discuss solutions to religiously- and racially-motivated crimes. Some members of parliament are still worried, however, that this motion is the first step in an attempt to stifle critics of Islam. I am not above such concerns. It is not difficult to change the wording of the motion, and the fact that the Liberals are unwilling to make such slight alterations alarms me. Perhaps I’m being paranoid, but when it comes to my rights, I don’t mind being overprotective.

I would like to stress that I agree with the principles advanced in M-103. Eliminating discrimination is a commendable endeavour, and I fully support a revised motion. However, as it stands, M-103 is too ambiguous, and I can’t support something if I don’t know precisely what it means. I sincerely hope that the two parties can see past their differences on this issue. Surely, we can agree on cultivating a culture that condemns violence and discrimination in all its forms.

The Other Press

The Other Press, Douglas College's student newspaper since 1976. Articles, insight and updates from the New West and Coquitlam campuses.

More Posts - Website

5 comments on “Ambiguity in the M-103 proposal
  1. I think that what you said was actually very logical.
    However, consider this, what if you typed a catchier title?
    I ain’t saying your content is not good, but suppose you added something that makes people desire more?
    I mean The Other Press | Ambiguity in the M-103 proposal is kinda boring.
    You ought to glance at Yahoo’s home page
    and see how they create article titles to get people to click.
    You might try adding a video or a related picture or two to grab readers excited about what you’ve
    written. Just my opinion, it might bring your blog a little livelier.

  2. We stumbled over here different website and thought I might as well
    check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you.
    Look forward to looking at your web page for a second time.

  3. Hey there would you mind letting me know which
    web host you’re utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads
    a lot quicker then most. Can you recommend a good hosting provider at a reasonable price?
    Cheers, I appreciate it!

  4. Everyone loves what you guys are usually up too.
    Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the wonderful works guys
    I’ve added you guys to my own blogroll.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.