Bad is bad, but passive is worse

Why passivity is unacceptable

By Natalie Serafini, Opinions Editor

ā€œFirst they came for the Jews and I did not speak outā€”because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the communists and I did not speak outā€”because I was not a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak outā€”because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for meā€”and there was no one left to speak out for me.ā€

-Martin Niemƶller

If you and I disagree about something, I truly donā€™t mind. I mean, if we have a difference in beliefs, I donā€™t have a problem with the fact that we think differently. I canā€™t guarantee that I wonā€™t think youā€™re a jerk-wad, but I appreciate when people are opinionated. Without conflicting opinions, society is in danger of stagnation. Instead, what I canā€™t stand in people is passivity.

I understand that most people donā€™t get as angry about everything as I do. I also get that I, like many others, am oblivious to many issues, that I donā€™t always make the right choices, and that I canā€™t possibly take on every global injustice. But I can try: I can try to be aware; I can try to care if I donā€™t already; and I can try to do something, however insignificant.

This is why passivity is so frustrating to me. If people are aware of and care about an issue, ignoring the problem demonstrates a lack of integrity. If they purposely avoid educating themselves, they are guilty of ignorance.

The excuses given are often that we ā€œshould agree to disagreeā€ and ā€œcanā€™t constantly be fighting every battle.ā€ Itā€™s true that society will most likely never come to an agreement on every subject, and that one person taking on every injustice isnā€™t realistic. Nonetheless, there are too many people doing too little.

We donā€™t have to protest, and we donā€™t have to fight every battle. But many people donā€™t fight any battles. Never mind fighting a battleā€”fighting suggests getting off your ass and actually protesting or sacrificing something. How about supporting an issue? How about saying to yourself, ā€œHey! I donā€™t like sweatshops! I should find companies that donā€™t employ sweatshops, and support those companies.ā€ Itā€™s easy to vote with your dollar. People in the States are doing it in droves over Chick-fil-Aā€™s blatant support of anti-gay agendas. To not do anything because itā€™s more convenient is inexcusable.

Agreeing to disagree is no position at all; itā€™s not even an attempt at neutrality in instances where peopleā€™s rights are being infringed upon. You cannot justify standing by when you could easily do something, no matter how seemingly insignificant. To shrug and say ā€œWe canā€™t fight every battleā€ or ā€œLetā€™s agree to disagreeā€ is to abdicate responsibility. If each of us only fights the battles that affect us, no one will ever have the power to make a difference.