Why passivity is unacceptable
By Natalie Serafini, Opinions Editor
āFirst they came for the Jews and I did not speak outābecause I was not a Jew. Then they came for the communists and I did not speak outābecause I was not a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak outābecause I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for meāand there was no one left to speak out for me.ā
-Martin Niemƶller
If you and I disagree about something, I truly donāt mind. I mean, if we have a difference in beliefs, I donāt have a problem with the fact that we think differently. I canāt guarantee that I wonāt think youāre a jerk-wad, but I appreciate when people are opinionated. Without conflicting opinions, society is in danger of stagnation. Instead, what I canāt stand in people is passivity.
I understand that most people donāt get as angry about everything as I do. I also get that I, like many others, am oblivious to many issues, that I donāt always make the right choices, and that I canāt possibly take on every global injustice. But I can try: I can try to be aware; I can try to care if I donāt already; and I can try to do something, however insignificant.
This is why passivity is so frustrating to me. If people are aware of and care about an issue, ignoring the problem demonstrates a lack of integrity. If they purposely avoid educating themselves, they are guilty of ignorance.
The excuses given are often that we āshould agree to disagreeā and ācanāt constantly be fighting every battle.ā Itās true that society will most likely never come to an agreement on every subject, and that one person taking on every injustice isnāt realistic. Nonetheless, there are too many people doing too little.
We donāt have to protest, and we donāt have to fight every battle. But many people donāt fight any battles. Never mind fighting a battleāfighting suggests getting off your ass and actually protesting or sacrificing something. How about supporting an issue? How about saying to yourself, āHey! I donāt like sweatshops! I should find companies that donāt employ sweatshops, and support those companies.ā Itās easy to vote with your dollar. People in the States are doing it in droves over Chick-fil-Aās blatant support of anti-gay agendas. To not do anything because itās more convenient is inexcusable.
Agreeing to disagree is no position at all; itās not even an attempt at neutrality in instances where peopleās rights are being infringed upon. You cannot justify standing by when you could easily do something, no matter how seemingly insignificant. To shrug and say āWe canāt fight every battleā or āLetās agree to disagreeā is to abdicate responsibility. If each of us only fights the battles that affect us, no one will ever have the power to make a difference.