Girls: More than just a Lena Dunham show

Earlier this week a friend asked me what it felt like to be the editor-in-chief of The Other Pressā€”and also a girl. My answer? It feels like being the editor-in-chief of The Other Press. Granted, it has been a number of years since an editor with confirmed lady parts sat in the big swivel chair at the OP, but I canā€™t really see why my sex should be a factor of consideration when it comes to my work. My friend (male and, sadly, not an avid reader of this fine publication) explained that, ā€œlike, you probably make people write about chick stuff.ā€

In general, I donā€™t feel that my vagina dictates the editorial policy of The Other Press.

Just as any human has certain tastes, preferences, and opinions, I make choices for what I feel is the best student publication for Douglas College readers. I donā€™t have a set ā€œgirlyā€ quota when it comes to content.

However, I do find it fitting that this weekā€™s issue is chock-a-block full of excellent writing about womenā€™s issues. From Ashley Pittā€™s informed opinion on the recent protest scandal at the Paramount Gentlemenā€™s Club to Carleigh Bakerā€™s feature article investigating if FEMEN-style topless protest has a place in Vancouver, to Natalie Serafiniā€™s response to the assumption that Vancouver women arenā€™t friendly, to a spotlight article on the Gender Equality Clubā€™s first ever publication, The Other Press is certainly repping the ladies this weekā€”not because Iā€™m a girl, but because these girls are worth discussion to everyone.